robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Ken wrote:
> > I've posted *my* first-pass definition of the term: a TLP that
> > has no deliverable packages of its own, only from its subprojects.
> my first pass definition is quite different:
> an umbrella is a project where there is the legal and formal
> organization structures do not coincide.
> symptoms include divisions between committers (sub-projects with separate
> karma and mailing lists) and the need for additional rules and management
> due to the inability to provide oversight over the entire codebase.
Robert, so you would want to ask the same question I asked Dain? To wit:
- Are you going to make one community from the bunch,
with everyone having access to work on every piece
of code?
- Are you going to have a large, single, PMC with everyone
having binding decisions over every aspect of the project?
Are those indicators for your definition? Sounds like you'd have those, and
additional ones.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
