-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> 
> Just to make sure this was allowed, before pitching it to the 
> communities, I asked a few of the Board members at Euro OS con and 
> they said it was possible.  I didn't want to get into a situation 
> where we do all of the work to uproot and move exiting communities 
> and then end up with just a bunch of separate TLPs because of some 
> unknown apache rules.  Now it seem like that is exactly what will 
> happen.

Why do you say that?  Noel has stated his current *personal* opinion,
and his *personal* opinion of board policy as

> Keep in mind that the ASF Board has established a pretty conscious
> decision for projects to go TLP, and to disband umbrella projects.

IMHO, a podling that was envisioned as joining an existing TLP
will end up doing so unless there are really good reasons for it
to go TLP instead.  The only time (again IMHO) that the collective
desires of the specific communities involved (in this case,
AMQ and Geronimo) would be overruled is if the determination
is made that such a merger would not make sense or would not
be in the best interests of the ASF.    As an hypothetical
example, I very much doubt that a podling for a pattern
recognition filtering package would be allowed to join the HTTP
Server project, despite being originally intended for filtering
server logs.  A traffic-filtering module written to the httpd
API would be unlikely to go anywhere else.  An IRC server based
on the httpd framework might go either way.

It's not just rhe podling's and sponsor's communities that need
to be considered, although they're by far the biggest part.  It's
also the overall Apache community that needs to be factored in.
If going subproject is considered to be likely to be harmful to
the ASF, it won't happen.  Otherwise it probably will.

All IMHO.
- --
#ken    P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRBf8a5rNPMCpn3XdAQL5VwP9E/nNpdNA3CHD4jjLrCqwSRy7dgXUjzQj
OCCujB5mm2H8LMVhNYgHSfRYlrQAAayXrizwTwUT5zZIOstbX9scUSGM5MCnHOg8
ZakW6O/+N41EaNkdWhBBdwPHVNl9PmTqbwb5sMW1Abo+RKtPEVUG1gnheoFyqd4M
6w82VLeqVi0=
=NVCO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to