On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I knew that many did not want renamings to occur, being touted as "expensive", so I still stand behind my last proposal (that has been trimmed here) which seems to me like a possible "compromise":
I'll just chime in belatedly and say that if the incubated project used Subversion, renaming is *easy*. CVS sucks for this.
;-)
Unfortunatley, projects should stick to what they'll use later.
While we can do renaming of lists, etc, it's a pain (saying as one of the four schmucks that will get stuck doing it). I think we're willing to do it as long as it's infrequent. The biggest problem is that projects want their old aliases to work for a little while. From our perspective, that's the really annoying part.
As this is a technical thing, can't scripting be used to automate it?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
