Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The draft seems to be using RFC 2119
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt)
> > terminology. If so, let's please reference the RFC early in the
document so
> > that readers can find the operation definitions (thus establishing
common
> > volcabulary).
> Whoops. There is a line in there :
> "Where capitalised, these terms are to be used as per the definitions
> found in RFC 2119 (Reference)."
> So I think I was thinking (which is a lot of thinking) the same thing :>.
> Will fix.
Fix what? Looks like you already did it. I was looking at your e-mail, not
the site, and the line wasn't in the extract, but has been in the full
document since the third revision on Sept 28th. :-) Mea culpa. :-)
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
