Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
If a project cannot work well with the Sponsor PMC it's a failure, the Incubator will not agree to make it go. It may decide to swith targets, but imposing a project on non-willing PMC is simply out of question.
OK - good. Mind you that I don't intend this to be a critique to the podling, I'm rather trying to prevent what happened to Jakarta in the past: many disconnected subprojects under an umbrella PMC with little community glue in-between them.
This is not an issue for the Incubator IMO, but if ever of the board and how it manages the PMCs with the chairs and how it pushes project policies.
Project PMCs are self-governing, and the Incubator is here only to incubate for them only under their request.
It's part of judging if the Incubation is succesfull.
For example, for Lenya I'm wondering if Cocoon is the right place for them, as I've not seen much involvment. I'll wait and see, but for now I would not vote for exit as there is not much integration.
As a member of the Cocoon, or Incubator PMC?
Is there a difference?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
