Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
If a project cannot work well with the Sponsor PMC it's a failure, the Incubator will not agree to make it go. It may decide to swith targets, but imposing a project on non-willing PMC is simply out of question.
Which may require a vote of the PMC in question to determine?
I don't think so. Not clear situations are failures themselves.
Isn't it best to leave this part of it to the PMC in question - if we don't need to specify then should we?
We need to give someone, and this someone is a *single* entity, the burden of declaring succes or failure. Since the final responsibility is on the Incubator PMC...
I have done cross-votes for accepting projects and it has been quite a mess. So now we just accept any project that is voted in by a PMC.
The same thing is about incubation.
If a PMC does not want a project it can technically still vote and ask the incubator to not have it, there is no rule that can prevent that.
But it would be a case of a very dysfunctional Incubator and thus should not have to be part of the standard process.
I think it will/*should* never occur, as the two PMCs should be kept in contact by the shepherd, and basically have a converging view over what is happening.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
