Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Engagement by the XMLbeans community with the XML PMC and other ASF sub communities, particularly infrastructure@ (this reflects my personal bias that projects should pay an infrastructure "tax").
Incubator PMC has voted for graduation
XML PMC has voted for final acceptance
Not needed. XML PMC already accepted it, we cannot have the case in which the Incubator says ok, and then the XML one does not. As a sponsor that has voted for incubation there is no reason why they have to vote again.
(nothing to do with the infrastructure tax:)
Do I read you correct in saying that the receiving PMC has no chance anymore to declare an incubation failed, if the Incubator PMC says the contrary?
Exactly.
The sponsoring PMC asks to have that project. This means that it *wants* that project and that community. Why would it change its mind?
In that case (and I hope I'm wrong), why is the receiving PMC involved then?
Eh? In the same way the shepherd is, the sponsor is, etc. They are involved in helping out and seeing that the incubated project becomes *part* of the community.
I don't understand you... how do you se the role of the sponsoring PMC instead?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
