Stephen McConnell wrote: > > The words "the sponsor should take responsibility" is something I agree > with and is the first tangible link to a rationale between sponsor and > Member that I have seen so far.
then i think we have been having a significant disconnect. i think the link has been very clearly identified. > For example, if a Member undertakes such a > resonsibility, to whom is the member responsible and what would be the > scope of such a responsibility? to the podling and the incubator pmc, to see that everything gets done and done properly. similarly to the foundation, with the additional responsibility of only sponsoring a podling which, in the member's judgement, will be an asset to the asf. > p.s. Please keep in mind that I looking at this in terms of documeted > incubation procedures which are not fully crystallised yet. > - not in terms of a specific projects, Members, or non-Members. then i'll expect to hear no more from you about 'discrimination against non-members.' -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
