Paul, thank you for your review! I have ballotted no-objection. Alissa
> On Apr 22, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD > before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see > the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-06 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2017-04-22 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-10 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-04-25 > > Summary: > > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. > > General Comments: > > This version is *much* easier to understand than the -04 version that I > previously reviewed. > > Issues: > > Major: 0 > Minor: 0 > Nits: 1 > > (1) Nit: > > In section 2.3 the requested handling of footnotes is confusing. > IIUC, the intent is: > > - add a new footnote between the existing [1] and [2]; > > - add a new footnote at the end after the existing [5]; > > - renumber the footnotes sequentially (from [1] to [7]); > > - adjust all the existing footnote references to refer to the same > footnote as previously, but using the new numbering; > > - then, add references to the new footnotes [2] and [7] to the entries > for TEREDO and Unique-Local. > > It took me a few readings of the current text to convince myself that is what > you intended. It would be better to be more explicit about it. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
