You're welcome. I hope that the Transport ADs are looking at David Black's comment, however.
Regards Brian On 11/06/2015 21:41, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thank you Brian for your review. > > Jari > > On 25 May 2015, at 06:59, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >> you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt >> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter >> Review Date: 2015-05-25 >> IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01 >> IESG Telechat date: >> >> Summary: Ready >> -------- >> >> Comment: >> -------- >> >> This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however: >> 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David >> Black). >> 2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC >> 5777. >> But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly >> compatible, >> I don't think that's right. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
