Nothing to add to my earlier review (i.e. Ready with comments).
Brian
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: RE: Gen-ART Last Call review of
draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:57:49 +0000
From: Black, David <david.bl...@emc.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>,
<lionel.mor...@orange.com> <lionel.mor...@orange.com>
CC: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes....@ietf.org
<draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes....@ietf.org>, General
Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Black, David <david.bl...@emc.com>
> 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David
> Black).
Last Call on this draft happened while I was on vacation; I’ll try to take a
look early next week before the telechat.
Thanks,
--David
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:41 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter; <lionel.mor...@orange.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes....@ietf.org; General Area
Review Team; Black, David
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of
draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
Brian,
Thank you for your review. I agree, the shepherd report should be amended to
remove the 'updates' language since the extensions
are optional.
Thank you,
Kathleen
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com<mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-05-25
IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: Ready
--------
Comment:
--------
This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however:
1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David
Black).
2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC 5777.
But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly
compatible,
I don't think that's right.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
