Brian, Thank you for your review. I agree, the shepherd report should be amended to remove the 'updates' language since the extensions are optional.
Thank you, Kathleen On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2015-05-25 > IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: Ready > -------- > > Comment: > -------- > > This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however: > 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David > Black). > 2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC > 5777. > But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly > compatible, > I don't think that's right. > -- Best regards, Kathleen
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
