I fully agree these names (100/101, A/B/C/D) are not very intuitive, I recommend using isa tags by year (e.g. x64_2010, x64_2014) like the python's platform tags (e.g. manylinux2010, manylinux2014).
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture lev... Richard Biener via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels H.J. Lu via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Allan Sandfeld Jensen
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Mark Wielaard
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels H.J. Lu via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Florian Weimer via Gcc
- RE: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Mallappa, Premachandra
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Dongsheng Song via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture lev... Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture... Richard Biener via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-archite... Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-arc... Richard Biener via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-arc... H.J. Lu via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-archite... Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture levels Jan Beulich
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture lev... Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture... Jan Beulich
- Re: New x86-64 micro-architecture... Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
