On 7/22/20 5:26 AM, Richard Biener via Libc-alpha wrote:
> So for the bike-shedding I indeed think x86-10{0,1,2,3}
> or x86-{A,B,C,..}, eventually duplicating as x86_64- as
> suggested by Jan is better than x86-2014 or x86-avx2.Agreed. If we really want to be clear, call it a "level" or something else that has a direct English meaning e.g. x86-level-101. This makes it unambiguously clear that this is some kind of step at which some kind of features are enabled. -- Cheers, Carlos.
