On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 6:28 AM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:47:47PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Ah, you suggested g: rather than just g. > > We could then support > > rNNNNN (1-6 decimal digits) - the svn revs, either for old repo, or > transformed > > g:XXXXX (X is any [0-9a-zA-Z_-], something else?, 1 or more chars) - > gitweb with XXXXX > I was thinking that anything at all after g: should go to gitweb. > > rNN-MMMMM (1-2 decimal digits, 1-6 decimal digits) - git undescr to hash > > rNN-MMMMM-gXXXXX (perhaps limit X to hashes here, i.e. 7-40 hex digits) > - gitweb with XXXXX > Why complicate this with the added 'g'? Jason
