On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 05:47:16PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Ok, so what about basepoints instead?
>
> That seems a better name to me.
Ok.
> > > I think the existing git hook configuration expects you to push only
> > > annotated tags, not lightweight tags (so you'd need to use -a / -s / -u
> > > when creating those tags).
> >
> > Ok, would use -a then; or do we plan to GPG sign some tags such as releases?
>
> I think signing future release tags is probably appropriate.
>
> > > This seems like another thing that would need new features in the hooks
> > > to
> > > support configuring email subjects and contents like that.
> >
> > Are the git hooks we use shared with AdaCore or GDB or where they come from
> > and can't be customized?
>
> Right now we have our own fork of the hooks in ~gccadmin/git-hooks. I
> hope that appropriately generic versions of the GCC-specific features can
> be developed that mean we can stop using our own fork at some point and
> symlink to the version used by GDB instead.
Ok, could that stuff be customized based on branch and repository names, or
some knob in a configuration file?
I'll have a look at the hooks.
Jakub