On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Tobias Ulmer <tobi...@tmux.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:26:48PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote: >> I can compile the first stage OK, and the binaries are quite modest: >> >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian ian 17.2M Sep 6 03:47 prev-gcc/cc1 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian ian 1.2M Sep 6 04:24 prev-gcc/cpp >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian ian 1.2M Sep 6 04:24 prev-gcc/xgcc > > Gcc 4.9 binaries on OpenBSD/amd64 are resonable: > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 11.6M Sep 9 03:02 cc1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 15.4M Sep 9 03:02 gnat1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 749K Sep 9 03:02 ecpp
I think we need to be able to explain this. It's an increase of over 60%, I wouldn't expect that to be due to the relative ineffiiciency of Intel instruction encoding over AMD. And it is not due to the inclusion of libsylkrts (it's much easier to say "Intel library", how many other libraries are there in GCC that were written by Intel?) because that is not in the stage1 bootstrap. Ian
