On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Ian Grant <ian.a.n.gr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Tobias Ulmer <tobi...@tmux.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:26:48PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
>> > The reason I'm doing this is that I want to understand why the total
>> > size of the binaries grew from around 10MB (gcc v 4.5) to over 70MB in
>> > 4.9
>>
>> There is indeed a problem with huge binaries on OpenBSD/arm, which I've
>> not yet figured out, but i386/amd64/sparc64 are fine.
>
>
> I don't have huge binaries (c.f. "Buster Gonad and his Infeasibly Large
> Testicles") on Open BSD. I have them on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian3 ian3 64M 2014-08-03 01:18 cc1
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian3 ian3 65M 2014-08-03 01:18 cc1obj
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian3 ian3 68M 2014-08-03 01:18 cc1plus
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian3 ian3 1.8M 2014-08-03 01:18 collect2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ian3 ian3 65M 2014-08-03 01:18 f951
>
>> Are you trying to build gcc from the vanilla sources? If so, you're in
>> for a treat...
>
>
> I didn't know there was chocolate source! Where is it?! And why is it a
> secret?
>
> Ian
>
