On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> wrote: >>> Please don't call it "the Intel library", that doesn't mean anything. >> Doesn't it? How did you know what 'it' was then? Or is that a stupid >> question? This identity concept is much slipperier than it seems at >> first, isn't it?
> You included error messages... Context. And this is what gave that noun meaning. Context is important in semantics. You can't tell what anything, a C compiler binary, for example, means in isolation. >> How about my question about the size of the binaries? Is that 60+MB >> what other systems show? > > I still see <20M here, but I don't know if there are reasons for what you > are seeing. Are you maybe using different options? (debug information, > optimization, lto, etc) That is very useful to know. Thanks. Ian
