On 28 November 2012 09:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28 November 2012 07:36, Xinliang David Li wrote: >> What you described is the 'transitional model' right? but I don't see >> any of those in the C++ standard working paper: >> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3347.pdf > > It's far too early for anything to have been voted into the working > paper, that doesn't change the fact there's a WG21 study group, > chaired by Doug, working on modules. See > http://isocpp.org/std/the-committee
Oh sorry, I didn't follow the link to realise that's Vandevoorde's most recent proposal. When you said "working paper" I thought you meant the current C++ draft, which is what people usually mean by "the C++ standard working paper". N3347 is just a proposal, it's not part of the standard and hasn't been approved or agreed on as being "the current state of modules". There are often competing or alternative proposals during development of a feature.
