On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/04/2012 09:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> On 2012-04-09 13:03:38 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Robert Dewar wrote: >>>> On 4/9/2012 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe -Wstandard isn't the best name though, as "standard" usually >>>>> means something quite specific for compilers, and the warning switch >>>>> wouldn't have anything to do with standards conformance. >>>> -Wdefault >>>> >>>> might be better >>> except if people want warnings about "defaults" in C++11 (which can mean >>> lot of things). >> >> How about a warning level? >> >> -W0: no warnings (equivalent to -w) >> -W1: default >> -W2: equivalent to the current -Wall >> -W3: equivalent to the current -Wall -Wextra > > I like this suggestion a lot. >
me, very not. :-( -- Gaby
