On 2012-04-09 13:03:38 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Robert Dewar <de...@adacore.com> wrote: > > On 4/9/2012 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > >> Maybe -Wstandard isn't the best name though, as "standard" usually > >> means something quite specific for compilers, and the warning switch > >> wouldn't have anything to do with standards conformance. > > > > -Wdefault > > > > might be better > > except if people want warnings about "defaults" in C++11 (which can mean > lot of things).
How about a warning level? -W0: no warnings (equivalent to -w) -W1: default -W2: equivalent to the current -Wall -W3: equivalent to the current -Wall -Wextra -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
