On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Robert Dewar <de...@adacore.com> wrote: > On 4/8/2012 4:26 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Robert Dewar<de...@adacore.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 4/8/2012 4:02 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> >>>> But I'd be just as happy with a -Wstandard (by any name) enabled by >>>> default as I would be with -Wall on by default. Only enabling warnings >>>> with very little chance of false positives would avoid most of the >>>> negative consequences. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, I think that is the case! That's certainly the philosophy we >>> follow in GNAT. >> >> >> and I think that is all this is about. I am puzzled we are still >> arguing... > > > We are discussing. And note that the idea of -Wstandard was certainly > not in your original proposal (note the [by now confusing] subject > of this thread!)
no, -Wstandard wasn't in my original proposal. It is the name suggested by Miles for the list I gave Arnaud upon request. -- Gaby
