On 4/8/2012 4:26 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Robert Dewar<de...@adacore.com> wrote:
On 4/8/2012 4:02 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I'd be just as happy with a -Wstandard (by any name) enabled by
default as I would be with -Wall on by default. Only enabling warnings
with very little chance of false positives would avoid most of the
negative consequences.
Yes, I think that is the case! That's certainly the philosophy we
follow in GNAT.
and I think that is all this is about. I am puzzled we are still arguing...
We are discussing. And note that the idea of -Wstandard was certainly
not in your original proposal (note the [by now confusing] subject
of this thread!)
