On 5 January 2012 18:24, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 05/01/12 18:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 5 January 2012 16:33, Marc Glisse wrote: >>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> >>>> If the final C++11 still requires gets in <cstdio>, despite it being >>>> removed in C11, that's probably also a bug in C++11. (At least the most >>>> recent draft I have to hand still has gets in <cstdio>.) >>> >>> >>> It still has it. And it is based more on C99 than C11 (which didn't exist at >>> the time), even if they did try to synchronize on some features. >> >> Yep, it still requires it, this is a glibc bug. >> >> Glibc should define gets if __cplusplus <= 201103L > > Filed http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13566 .
libstdc++ defines _GNU_SOURCE unconditionally, so if I read libio/stdio.h correctly then gets() won't be defined even for C++03, is that right? Whatever your view on whether C++11 should include gets() or not, C++03 definitely includes it.
