On 05/01/12 18:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 5 January 2012 16:33, Marc Glisse wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> >>> If the final C++11 still requires gets in <cstdio>, despite it being >>> removed in C11, that's probably also a bug in C++11. (At least the most >>> recent draft I have to hand still has gets in <cstdio>.) >> >> >> It still has it. And it is based more on C99 than C11 (which didn't exist at >> the time), even if they did try to synchronize on some features. > > Yep, it still requires it, this is a glibc bug. > > Glibc should define gets if __cplusplus <= 201103L
Filed http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13566 . Thanks, - Tom
