On 5 January 2012 16:33, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >> If the final C++11 still requires gets in <cstdio>, despite it being >> removed in C11, that's probably also a bug in C++11. (At least the most >> recent draft I have to hand still has gets in <cstdio>.) > > > It still has it. And it is based more on C99 than C11 (which didn't exist at > the time), even if they did try to synchronize on some features.
Yep, it still requires it, this is a glibc bug. Glibc should define gets if __cplusplus <= 201103L
