We want to look at proper patch submissions not at websites that change
from time to time. I really don't know what you take issue with, or where
the difficulty is. patch submission via gcc-patches@ is a requirement
since forever, not something arbitrarily imposed on specifically you to
annoy you.
What I'd like to know is why I am constantly being asked for more stuff
on the transactional memory branch, whereas the memory model stuff got
approved without even asking for a complete diff
That also isn't a proper merge proposal and shouldn't be merged without a
review. That simple.
(and I know what I'm being asked for, cause I'm doing both merges).
Similarly for when I merged the tuples branch and that stuff touched
everything!
The tuples branch merge was terrible, and was forced into GCC without a
real review (forced by ourself, because so many people did so much work
and it all would have been wasted hadn't we merged it, but no, it wasn't
in a good state, and shouldn't have been merged, we simply shouldn't let
this happen again).
Fair enough.
I don't have enough time to do both merges (cxx-mem-model and
transactional-memory) before the deadline then. I will concentrate on
separating out the patches for the transactional memory branch and post
them individually to gcc-patches.
Aldy
