Hi, On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > re-generates gcc/c-opts.c which was moved to gcc/c-family. I suppose > > sth was screwed up during some trunk->branch merge. Please review the > > patches yourself and look for these issues and fix them. > > Again, can you please hit reload on your browser? > > This was fixed yesterday after the latest merge. (I downloaded the patch with the superfluous files 64 minutes ago. Yes, now it's partly fixed, but it wasn't yesterday. Partly because it still contains gcc/c-opts.c). > Or you can just diff the branch yourself and see what's in the branch: > > svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/@180744 > --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/transactional-memory And how do you propose to meaningfully and easily comment on this diff, let those comments be known to you and your answers to that be known to me? eMail seems quite perfect for that. What's so difficult to just split the patches according to some topic or directory (frontends/middle-end/back-ends/target-lib/testcase/trans-mem.c) so that the pieces aren't larger than say 100k and send them to gcc-patches@? Because I do have noticed some (nitpicky if you will) things on the patch, and would have simply replied to such mail. Ciao, Michael.
