Hi, On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> What Richi is complaining about is something that got fixed yesterday > and is no longer in the branch, and can easily be fixed by hitting > reload on his browser. We want to look at proper patch submissions not at websites that change from time to time. I really don't know what you take issue with, or where the difficulty is. patch submission via gcc-patches@ is a requirement since forever, not something arbitrarily imposed on specifically you to annoy you. > What I'd like to know is why I am constantly being asked for more stuff > on the transactional memory branch, whereas the memory model stuff got > approved without even asking for a complete diff That also isn't a proper merge proposal and shouldn't be merged without a review. That simple. > (and I know what I'm being asked for, cause I'm doing both merges). > Similarly for when I merged the tuples branch and that stuff touched > everything! The tuples branch merge was terrible, and was forced into GCC without a real review (forced by ourself, because so many people did so much work and it all would have been wasted hadn't we merged it, but no, it wasn't in a good state, and shouldn't have been merged, we simply shouldn't let this happen again). Ciao, Michael.
