Ayal Zaks <ayal.z...@gmail.com> writes: >> (FWIW, libav did show up extra differences when using the patch >> that I'd originally submitted. They were due to the count_preds >> and count_succs thing that you picked up in your review.) > > > (These differences had no noticable consequences performance-wise, right?)
Well, because they were unintentional, I'm afraid I didn't measure them. The committed version didn't have these differences. (It was an assembly source comparison, so I don't have a ready way of measuring the performance of each affected loop.) Richard
