Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> writes: > I've been looking at SMS, and have a question about get_sched_window. > When there are previously-scheduled predessors, we use: > > if (e->data_type == MEM_DEP) > end = MIN (end, SCHED_TIME (v_node) + ii - 1); > > to get an upper bound on the scheduling window that is permitted > by memory dependencies. I think this: > > SCHED_TIME (v_node) + ii - 1 > > is an inclusive bound, in that scheduling the node at that time > would not break the memory dependence, whereas scheduling at > SCHED_TIME (v_node) would. Is that right?
I meant of course "scheduling at SCHED_TIME (v_node) + ii would". Richard
