Hello Richard,

> I ask because in the final range:
>
>       start = early_start;
>       end = MIN (end, early_start + ii);
>       /* Schedule the node close to it's predecessors.  */
>       step = 1;
>
> END is an exclusive bound.  It seems like we might be double-counting
here,
> and effectively limiting the schedule to SCHED_TIME (v_node) + ii - 2.

Yes, I think it indeed should be fixed. Thanks for reporting on this.

Revital

Reply via email to