On 22/07/11 00:47, Diogo Sousa wrote:
But readers will focus on the word "Issue" here and think that there is
something missing. Perhaps there should be a footnote explaining that
glibc/eglibc has the needed support, but that other libraries might not.
I agree. It should say something as "Library Dependent", and report
glibc status.
I have to disagree, library issue means that it's an issue with the
library, not gcc. Also, gcc should not list the status of a specific
library since there are so many that can be used besides glibc and it
would require someone to update it in case the status of that specific
library changes for a given feature.
Might be ok to do this in a wiki but in the main gcc documentation I
think it's good as it is.
--
PMatos
