Joern Rennecke <amyl...@spamcop.net> writes: > If you need more rigid scheduling, you can use CC0.
No, please don't. I accept that CC0 is necessary today for a few processors, but I really don't think we should encourage any new uses of it. Ian
Joern Rennecke <amyl...@spamcop.net> writes: > If you need more rigid scheduling, you can use CC0.
No, please don't. I accept that CC0 is necessary today for a few processors, but I really don't think we should encourage any new uses of it. Ian