daniel tian <daniel.xnt...@gmail.com> writes:

> 2009/12/11 Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com>:
>> daniel tian <daniel.xnt...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>     I have a problem about RTL sequence.
>>>     If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule 
>>> them.
>>>     Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
>>>
>>>     emit_insn(reg0,  operands[0]);
>>>     emit_insn(reg1,  reg0);
>>>     emit_insn(operands[0],  reg1);
>>>
>>>     But gcc will will reorder the three rtl in optimization.
>>>     I just wanna the those rtl in one block as a unit, don't let the
>>> gcc disrupt the sequence.
>>>     How can I do it?
>>
>> Write a single define_insn which emits the instructions you want to
>> treat as a unit.
>>
>
> Does there any solution in RTL level?
> Because I already solve the problem in ASM output level,  exactly the
> same solution as you suggest in this email.
> I may need do some optimization later. So RTL level will be great!

As far as I know there is no way to do this at the RTL level.  I don't
know why there would be a way, as it does not strike me as a useful
feature to have.  If the instructions must stay together at the
assembly level, use a single define_insn.  If you use multiple
define_insns, then it's OK for the compiler to move them around.

Ian

Reply via email to