> Mike Stump's recommendation on this issue is to use the match > darwin[912]* to make sure that this is captured for darwin9 through > darwin29. The idea is to not match darwin3 through darwin8. This usage > is present in several places... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00333.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01532.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00177.html
Ok, then using darwin[[912]]* is also fine. I misremembered darwin9 as Tiger which was the first publicly distributed version supporting Intel CPUs, wasn't it? Paolo