gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Eric Gallager
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Alexandre Oliva via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231014 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about gimple code during optimizing if-conversion Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about gimple code during optimizing if-conversion Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Question about gimple code during optimizing if-conversion Jeff Law via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231013 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231012 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office, Friday October 13, 18:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• Using "--enable-standard-branch-protection" flag for arm64 cause test failures Yash Shinde via Gcc
• Function multiversioning ABI issues Andrew Carlotti via Gcc
  • Re: Function multiversioning ABI issues Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Function multiversioning ABI issues Andrew Carlotti via Gcc
• Register allocation cost question Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: Register allocation cost question Segher Boessenkool
  • Re: Register allocation cost question Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: Register allocation cost question Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: Register allocation cost question Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc
  • Re: Register allocation cost question Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: Register allocation cost question Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• Clarification regarding various classes DIE's attribute value class Rishi Raj via Gcc
  • Re: Clarification regarding various classes DIE's attribute value class Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Clarification regarding various classes DIE's attribute value class Jan Hubicka via Gcc
• RFD: doloop needs better support for nested loops Joern Rennecke
  • Re: RFD: doloop needs better support for nested loops Richard Biener via Gcc
• C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Joel Sherrill
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Joseph Myers
  • Re: C89 question: Do we need to accept -Wint-conversion warnings Florian Weimer via Gcc
• Documenting common C/C++ options Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Documenting common C/C++ options Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: Documenting common C/C++ options Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: Documenting common C/C++ options Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Documenting common C/C++ options Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Documenting common C/C++ options Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: Documenting common C/C++ options Florian Weimer via Gcc
• gnu glibc h3140067568--- via Gcc
  • Re: gnu glibc Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Odd Python errors in the G++ testsuite Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: Odd Python errors in the G++ testsuite Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Odd Python errors in the G++ testsuite Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: Odd Python errors in the G++ testsuite Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Odd Python errors in the G++ testsuite Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: Odd Python errors in the G++ testsuite Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231008 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Discussion on ROP Mitigation Measures [-fzero-call-used-regs=all] Nan ZoE via Gcc
• Federal officials Scammer Scammer via Gcc
• Sources required... Jacob Navia via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231007 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• why not optimize static local variables Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: why not optimize static local variables Richard Biener via Gcc
• Code size explosion with -O2 Jakub Svojgr via Gcc
  • Re: Code size explosion with -O2 David Edelsohn via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231006 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on October 17th at 11am EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231005 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: LRA for avr: Maintain live range info for pseudos assigned to FP? Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
  • Re: LRA for avr: Maintain live range info for pseudos assigned to FP? SenthilKumar.Selvaraj--- via Gcc
  • Re: LRA for avr: Maintain live range info for pseudos assigned to FP? Georg-Johann Lay
• Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Scaling -fmacro-prefix-map= to thousands entries Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc
• -Wint-conversion as errors seems doable for GCC 14 Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: -Wint-conversion as errors seems doable for GCC 14 Sam James via Gcc
• [no subject] bandar Assaf via Gcc
• Mc c h big c. C bc Duane Goetz via Gcc
• Tuesday, October 3, 2023 Activation Services Desktop Control Services
• Function return value can't be infered when it's not inlined Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Function return value can't be infered when it's not inlined Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Function return value can't be infered when it's not inlined Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Function return value can't be infered when it's not inlined Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Function return value can't be infered when it's not inlined Richard Biener via Gcc
• RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release meeting reminder (October 3rd, 2023) Eop Chen via Gcc
• Question about function splitting Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about function splitting Martin Jambor
  • Re: Question about function splitting Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about function splitting Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question about function splitting Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231001 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• contrib/reghunt documentation Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: contrib/reghunt documentation Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: contrib/reghunt documentation Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• B deed ozzie696919--- via Gcc
• gcc-13-20230930 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• smtgcc translation validation Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
  • Re: smtgcc translation validation Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: smtgcc translation validation Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
• RT ET XX Yasmin Parfett via Gcc
• gcc-12-20230929 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Check whether the global variable has been modified in a function or some blocks Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• how to support GCC ? Radisson97--- via Gcc
• gcc-11-20230928 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• MIPS Built-ins Ильвир Низамов via Gcc
• GCC workshop at university Benjamin Priour via Gcc
  • Re: GCC workshop at university David Malcolm via Gcc
• Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Toon Moene
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Tobias Burnus
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Toon Moene
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Toon Moene
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran. Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• Re: School District Contact - 2023 Susan Miller via Gcc
• After Cauldron - online mini BoFs and Fosdem Mark Wielaard
  • Anyone interesting to submit a GCC devroom request proposal at FOSDEM? (was Re: After Cauldron - online mini BoFs and Fosdem) Dodji Seketeli
  • Re: Anyone interesting to submit a GCC devroom request proposal at FOSDEM? (was Re: After Cauldron - online mini BoFs and Fosdem) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Anyone interesting to submit a GCC devroom request proposal at FOSDEM? (was Re: After Cauldron - online mini BoFs and Fosdem) Thomas Schwinge
• Question about merging if-else blocks Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about merging if-else blocks Marc Glisse via Gcc
  • Re: Question about merging if-else blocks Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about merging if-else blocks Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question about merging if-else blocks Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about merging if-else blocks Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question about merging if-else blocks Florian Weimer via Gcc
• Re: Incremental LTO Project Thomas Schwinge
• Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron Anaya Shah via Gcc
• Re: seek advice about GCC learning weizhe wang via Gcc
  • Re: seek advice about GCC learning Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: seek advice about GCC learning weizhe wang via Gcc
  • Re: seek advice about GCC learning David Brown
• Exporting inline functions Nima Hamidi via Gcc
  • Re: Exporting inline functions Paul Iannetta via Gcc
• ipa-inline & what TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P can assume Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: ipa-inline & what TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P can assume Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: ipa-inline & what TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P can assume Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• Complex numbers support: discussions summary Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Tamar Christina via Gcc
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Paul Iannetta via Gcc
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Paul Iannetta via Gcc
  • RE: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Tamar Christina via Gcc
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Paul Iannetta via Gcc
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Toon Moene
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Toon Moene
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Joseph Myers
  • Complex numbers support: discussions summary Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
  • Complex numbers support: discussions summary Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Toon Moene
  • Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
• The order of loop traversal in gcc Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: The order of loop traversal in gcc Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: The order of loop traversal in gcc Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• gcc-14-20230924 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [PING][PATCH v2] Add clang's invalid-noreturn warning Julian Waters via Gcc
• Re: Question on -fwrapv and -fwrapv-pointer Kees Cook via Gcc
• gcc-13-20230923 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode François Dumont via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode François Dumont via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode François Dumont via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode Iain Sandoe
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode François Dumont via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode Iain Sandoe
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix coroutine tests for libstdc++ gnu-version-namespace mode François Dumont via Gcc
• Loop fusion in gcc Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Loop fusion in gcc Richard Biener via Gcc

• Later messages