Kazu Hirata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Ian, > > >> I don't see why: > >> > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html > >> > >> was a bad thing. i think gcc would have been better if it had just > >> been committed. > > Not fair. Zack himself says the patch is not recommended for commit, > > and it just a baseline for further work. For this kind of target > > specific change, I think it is best to let the target port maintainers > > make the call. I've CC'ed the maintainers listed for h8. Perhaps > > they will take a look at it. > > I am aware of the define_constraints patch. I am thinking about > working on the H8 and M68K ports at least. How urgent is this? FWIW, > I've reproduced the ICE that Zack mentioned, but I haven't > investigated it.
It's not urgent at all. Ian
