Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't see why: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html > > was a bad thing. i think gcc would have been better if it had just > been committed.
Not fair. Zack himself says the patch is not recommended for commit, and it just a baseline for further work. For this kind of target specific change, I think it is best to let the target port maintainers make the call. I've CC'ed the maintainers listed for h8. Perhaps they will take a look at it. Ian