Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I don't see why:
> 
>    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html
> 
> was a bad thing.  i think gcc would have been better if it had just
> been committed.

Not fair.  Zack himself says the patch is not recommended for commit,
and it just a baseline for further work.  For this kind of target
specific change, I think it is best to let the target port maintainers
make the call.  I've CC'ed the maintainers listed for h8.  Perhaps
they will take a look at it.

Ian

Reply via email to