On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:45:21AM +0000, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > On 02/03/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:31:12AM +0000, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > >> On 02/03/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >A week is too short of time to ping a patch. > >> > > >> > >> Ups! I actually believed that a week was the recommended time to ping > >> a patch. What is it then? > > > >Sometimes the only knowledgeable reviewer will be away on vacation. > > > > And? If I knew that the only knowledgeable reviewer is away on > vacation, I will hold my pings. But if I don't know, what is the > problem with keeping pinging?
I don't think that pings are a problem. My original answer was meant to say that you can't, in general, expect an answer in under a week.
