Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
You are getting two overflow warnings for the same expression? That
should not happen (TM). The TREE_OVERFLOW bit should have been noticed
and prevent giving another warning. Roger, do you agree on this?
Paolo, would you mind opening a bug report for this? I will look at it
as soon as I can.
Sure. In fact, I was scratching my head about that. To be honest, I'm
still not completely acquainted with the new warning (and I'm
particularly interested because -Wsystem-headers triggers quite a few
from the library...)
Paolo.
