Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| >Specifically, for PR 30465 "((T)1 << 31) - 1" is potentially undefined | >when T is a 32-bit signed type, but well-defined if T is unsigned or | >wider than 32-bits. | > | FYI: this specific issue arises from std::numeric_limits<wchar_t> on | x86-linux: in particular from the __glibcxx_max macro at the beginning | of the header. Luckily, since we are dealing with template | specializations, the pragma is sufficient to suppress the warning, but | if you can figure out a better way to compute the max itself, just | speak... I would like to understand this issue better and AVOID the pragma. If we need a pragma to make numeric_limits<wchar_t> not trigger warning then something is broken in either the warning machinery or numeric_limits<wchar_t> or both. -- Gaby
