On 14/01/07, Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> New? Woverflow is not new, as far as I know, if was just a bit broken,
>> especially in C++. But in these cases in particular, nothing should
>> have changed since we branched 4.2.
>
> Well, certainly new wrt 4_1-branch, the last release branch...
By the way, "new" also wrt current 4_2-branch, in the sense that the
latter doesn't emit *any* overflow warning for the snippet in 30465,
with explicit -Wconversion too...
And it does with Wconversion? Wconversion should not emit any overflow
warning, that is responsibility of Woverflow.
I will investigate and report back. If you find more cases or issues,
please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CC list of the PR.
Cheers,
Manuel
