On 3/17/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Guenther, would you please add a README to libgcc-math > explaining that it that the GLIBC code is not part of GCC, as per the > web page above? Also, please document that all of the GLIBC files are
I will do so. > not to be changed, except by reimporting from GLIBC. If any of the > GLIBC files have been changed from their upstream sources, please submit > those changes to the GLIBC maintainers ASAP. I will try to get the (minor) changes accepted upstream. > Because RMS has approved the use of GLIBC's software floating-point code > in GCC's runtime libraries, using GPL + exception, the correct thing for > Joseph Myers to do with his recent patch is to mark those files as not > part of GCC, but rather as part of GLIBC, and adjust the copyright > notice to be GPL + exception. Joseph should also document (in a README > or similar) that these files are not to be changed, except by import > from upstream GLIBC. Do I understand this correctly that the upstream GLIBC versions of the files will get their license changed, or will this happen only in the GCC copy? Thanks, Richard.
