Ross Ridge wrote:
> Thinking semantically is irrelevent because the question isn't whether GCC
> conforms to C99 or POSIX.  It clearly doesn't.  GCC fails the as-if rule.
> The question is one of implementation burden, which can only be answered
> by examining GCC's implementation.
 
Robert Dewar wrote:
> Once again we are not discussing general conformance here, just 
> conformance on this specific issue.
Wrong.  The question that was asked and I answered was about
implementation burden, not conformance.

                                                Ross Ridge

-- 
 l/  //   Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/rridge/ 
 db  //   

Reply via email to