Ross Ridge wrote: > Thinking semantically is irrelevent because the question isn't whether GCC > conforms to C99 or POSIX. It clearly doesn't. GCC fails the as-if rule. > The question is one of implementation burden, which can only be answered > by examining GCC's implementation. Robert Dewar wrote: > Once again we are not discussing general conformance here, just > conformance on this specific issue.
Wrong. The question that was asked and I answered was about implementation burden, not conformance. Ross Ridge -- l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU [oo][oo] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/rridge/ db //