Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GENERIC > GOMP_PARALLEL <parallel_clauses data_clauses, body> > > GIMPLE > GOMP_PARALLEL <g_parallel_clauses g_data_clauses, L1, L2> > L1: > g_body > L2:
I personally find it kind of baffling to have the same tree code act differently in GENERIC and GIMPLE, a la SWITCH_EXPR. It seems to add confusion for minimal benefit. If you are suggesting that the single tree code GOMP_PARALLEL have different operands in GENERIC and GIMPLE, can I suggest that you instead use two different tree coes? Ian
