On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:59:24PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > Sure, in the same way we know what "strlen" is. > Excellent. I'll get rid of them then.
> > That's what I thought at first, but the standard threw me into a > > loop when it mentioned "id-expression" instead of just > > "identifier" in the C++ case. If they're essentially the same, > > then great. > > id-expression is a non-terminal from the iso c++ grammar. ;-) > Ah, OK. Standardese puts me to sleep in no time ;) Diego.
