On Wednesday 04 May 2005 13:15, Biagio Lucini wrote: > On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21.16, Diego Novillo wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:05:05PM +0200, Lars Segerlund wrote: > > > we have to extend the gfortran internal representation also > > > > Yes, initially most of the effort will be in C/C++ since that's > > the only parser we have so far. > > Is there any obstruction in principle to have the so-called sentinel > directive (!$OMP) recognised by the gfortran parser?
I have no objections. It'd be nice to have OpenMP support, but it's not currently a high priority for me. > Talking with Lars, I > have understood that at the moment some misbehaviour of the front-end > prevents it, but I don't quite understand what the problem is. Can anyone > shed some light? Basically the fortran parser does trial-and-error pattern matching, and can end up parsing a single comment many times. Paul
