On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:19:19PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | Seems to me that if C++ is all of the sudden interested in > | dictating memory semantics for threaded programs, it should also > | provide language capabilities for other synchronization models > | and for threads (as in Java, though the memory model of Java used > | to have problems of its own, dunno if they've been fixed). > > There has been formed a subgroup of the C++ evolution group looking at > concurrency/threading. > Sounds interesting. But pretty please, don't introduce hidden synchronization? Particularly if it's overloading keywords that have been used for decades with completely different semantics.
Diego.
